Durer's Underweysung der Messung contains a very
interesting
discussion of perspective and other techniques and it typifies the
renaissance
idea that polyhedra are models worthy of an artist's
attention. More importantly, this book presents early examples
of polyhedral nets, i.e., polyheda unfolded to lie flat for
printing.
The image at right is Durer's drawing of the net of an icosahedron.
While the net is correct, his techniques of perspective were still
under
development, and it is interesting to observe that the projection at
the
upper right has a number of inaccuracies.
Here is another of Durer's nets. This is intended as a truncation of a truncated cube. While most of his nets are quite accurate, this contains a significant error, which you will notice if you study it for a few moments. Eight of the vertices (those at the top left and top right of the four central dodecagons) show 360 degrees worth of angles around them, and so can not fold as intended. This should serve as a reminder that the idea of a net is not as simple and obvious as one might suppose.
An interesting property of this polyhedron, which might be why
Durer
included it, is this: if the dodecagons are regular then it can be
inscribed
in a sphere.
The
Underweysung
der Messung is also significant because it
contains
the first presenation of the snub
cube.
The snub cube is the first of the chiral Archimedean
solids to be rediscovered in the Renaissance. (The other, the
snub
dodecahedron, had to wait for Kepler.)
Given the chirality of the snub cube, it strikes me as strange that
Durer
did not give a picture of the solid itself or mention its two
forms.
He contented himself with the net at right.
One of Durer's masterpieces, the engraving Melancholia I, features a frustrated thinker sitting by an uncommon polyhedron. (Click the image for a larger version.) Much has been written analyzing the symbolism in the image and the possible meaning of every element including the polyhedron. One might speculate that the cube represents masculinity and truncating one in an upright position may have some Freudean symbolism.
Geometrically, the polyhedron is simply a cube or rhombohedron which has been truncated at the upper vertex. (I can not decide if the lower vertex is also truncated so the solid rests on a triangular face, or if the lower vertex symbolically penetrates the earth, but no other writers seem to allow for that possibility.) Panofsky accurately describes it simply as a "truncated rhomboid." It is possible to proportion it so that the vertices project onto a 4-by-4 square grid like that of the magic square (see the papers by Lynch and Sharp). Schreiber proposes that it comes from a rhombohedron with 72-degree face angles, which has been truncated so it can be inscribed in a sphere. This polyhedron continues to sire a considerable literature, so for those who wish to read some of what has been written about it, here are a few references to get you started: